Millerites Not Comet Kooks
Larry Kirkpatrick, 5 July 1997
What the Millerites Were About
The "Millerites" were a group of Christian persons who arose in the
years preceding 1844, teaching the imminent arrival of the judgment hour
for man and the literal, physical, audible, personal second coming of Christ
- in direct contrast to the widespread teaching of the time that the
coming of Christ would be about 1000 years in the future. They
eventually derived from Bible prophecy a sound computation for what they
expected to be the Lord's return. Although they arrived at a sound computation
of the time prophecies, they were mistaken as to the event expected.
The Seventh-day Adventist Church, (a vigorous and growing religious movement
now (1997) 10+ million members strong throughout the world, with some 800,000
in the USA), arose out of the aftermath of the failed expectations and
was founded as a church in 1863.
As a people, the Millerites were about
-
Following their Lord fully
-
Thoroughly believing and studying the Bible
-
Putting their faith into action
-
Willingly presenting an unpopular message because they loved the Lord
Recently, in light of the tragic Heaven's Gate comet cult suicides, the
Millerites have been trotted out and associated with them - claims even
being made of 100 Millerite suicides in 1843. That claim is false. This
brief sketch will endeavor to give some accurate information on this fascinating
group and its background and sources that can be researched for independent
evaluation.
Who Was William Miller
He was a farmer and ultimately became a Baptist preacher. His
manner of interpreting the Bible set him apart, for his fundamental
approach to understanding the Bible was to let the Bible interpret itself,
through simply comparing Scripture with Scripture.
Whenever I found anything obscure, my practice was to compare it with
all collateral passages; and by the help of Cruden [a concordance], I examined
all the texts of Scripture in which were found any of the prominent words
contained in any obscure portion. Then, by letting every word have its
proper bearing in the subject of the text, if my view harmonized with every
collateral passage in the Bible, it ceased to be a difficulty. In this
way I pursued the study of the Bible, in my own perusal of it, for about
two years, and was fully satisfied that it is its own interpreter.[]
When he came to the books of Daniel and Revelation, he compared them with
history and saw a linear development and fulfillment of predictive prophecy
step by step, down through time. By about 1833 he had firmly reached
the conclusion that the prophecy of Daniel 8:14 set the "cleansing of the
sanctuary" around the date of 1843, some ten years hence. He erred
however in accepting the view contemporary to his time, that the sanctuary
to be cleansed was the earth itself. The consequences of this would
be significant.
What Happened
Having reached this extraordinary conclusion after years of study,
Miller faced what seemed to him an unpleasant prospect in knowing that
the material must be presented, but not himself desiring to be the one
to do it. He began to present his views in private as he had opportunity,
praying that some minister might feel their force and devote himself to
their promulgation. But he could not banish the conviction that he had
a personal duty to perform in giving the warning. As he communed with God
in prayer, he finally indicated that he was willing to present it, if he
would be called to preach. To his discomfort and surprise, a knock was
heard at the door within the hour. It was, of course, an unanticipated
invitation to preach![] Miller began, reluctantly, to preach. He
had no intention of beginning any independent religious movement. He never
did start one, nor left the baptist church of which he was a part. He died
in 1849 much poorer than when he began preaching. Nonetheless, when he
began to preach the response rapidly became overwhelming. Churches
of nearly every denomination opened their doors to him and invited him
to come and speak. He held lectures all over the northeast U.S.A., and
revivals followed wheverever he went.
Initially, his work was accepted. The Advent movement was perhaps the
modern precurser of the ecumenical movement, as congregations and persons
out of every faith flocked to the meetings, the lovely thought of so soon
seeing their Lord stimulating them with hope and fervor.
Unfortunately, however, Miller's teaching that Christ would come at
the beginning of the millenium (the 1,000 years of Revelation 20)
was in direct contradiction to the widespread belief of his day that Christ
would come at the end of the millenium. Nearly all churches in the
1830's and 1840's taught that the world had to be converted to Christ before
the millenium would begin. After that conversion there would be peace and
plenty on earth for 1,000 years. Then Jesus would come. That belief had
fueled the great reform movements of the day. It stood at the very heart
of Protestant teaching when Miller began to preach.
At first the churches and their ministers were not overly offended by
Miller's views. After all, he could draw a crowd and bring about conversions
to fill the churches. So even though many in the various denominations
believed him to be wrong about the Second Coming, they were willing to
tolerate him for pragmatic reasons.
That worked fine as long as the predicted date was still five or six
years away. But because Miller had predicted a specific year for the end
of the world, he and his movement were set on a collision course with the
churches as the time approached. Before the early 1840's the pulpits of
nearly all churches had been open to Miller, but that rapidly began to
change in 1842.[]
Miller, looking back upon it all shared the following:
In all my labors, I never had the desire or thought to establish any
separate interest from that of existing denominations, or to benefit one
at the expense of another. I thought to benefit all. Supposing that all
Christians would rejoice in the prospect of Christ's coming, and that those
who could not see as I did would not love any the less those who should
embrace this doctrine, I did not conceive there would ever be any necessity
for separate meetings. My whole object was a desire to convert souls to
God, to notify the world of a coming judgment, and to induce my fellow
men to make that preparation of heart which will enable them to meet their
God in peace. The great majority of those converted under my labors united
with the various existing churches.[]
In any case, by 1843 the tide was turning, and the trend of the mighty
movement was beginning to move in two contrasting directions. A ferver
was upon the land, and many came into the acceptance of the message.
But at the same time, the approaching nearness of the advent began to cast
a longer and longer shadow. The established religious bodies of the
day seemed to realize that they had much more to gain by the continuance
of the status quo than by real change. Many in these bodies uneasily
realized that they had much invested in this earthly life. For many Christians,
the necessity of changing the established habits and way of thinking that
stretched back many years was very uncomfortable. The influence of several
teachings that removed the wholistic view of man, and that removed the
necessity of obedience to God, left the soul unsatisfied and barren, and
left many with a potent foreboding that maybe they were not completely
right with God after all. How much easier to believe that a small
number of religious fanatics was all wrong, and stirred up over nothing!
But above all, the hearty zeal of the Millerites must find release, and
find it it did! In congregation after congregation the advent believers
shared how they were blessed by the near consumation of their desire. The
soul struggles of the sincere Millerites, the piety, the intense focus
upon Jesus Christ, left some persons cold. They felt condemned before
the living faith expressed by many Millerites. They began to labor to shut
up the testimony of the believers. Many were disfellowshipped for their
belief in the nearness of the advent. Others left of their own accord,
not only finding themselves unwelcome, but coming to realize that the chilling
wave of coldness arose from the rejection of the Holy Spirit by those who
refused to follow the light that God was now bringing to His people.
As the Millerites shared the necessity of reform, they came face to
face with several factors which opened their eyes to the fulfillment of
the second angel of Revelation 14:8, announcing the fall of Babylon. Charles
Fitch began to preach what became known as the midnight cry. Babylon had
been previously identified by Protestants, and even Catholics, as being
the Roman Catholic church. But now the advent believers personally
experienced bitter treatment at the hands of those who felt condemned by
their simple desire to seek readiness for their Lord's appearing.
Now fellow church members whom they had grown up with sought to suppress
even the discussion of the second coming. Fitch proclaimed that those who
persisted in this opposition and behavior were indeed themselves fallen,
and that much of Protestantism must also be included in the scriptural
designation "Babylon." Christians must flee error if they were to make
preparation for the imminent return of their Lord. The message which God
had sent for the testing and purification of the church revealed all too
surely how great was the number who had set their affections on this world
rather than upon Christ. The ties which bound them to earth were stronger
than the attractions heavenward. They chose to listen to the voice
of worldly wisdom and turned away from the heart-searching message
of truth. In refusing the warning to prepare for the imminent return
of Jesus and thus the judgment, they rejected the crucial eschatological
light sent by God.
In the summer of 1844, midway between the time when it had first been
thought the 2300 days would end, and the autumn of the same year, to which
it was afterward found that they extended, the message was proclaimed in
the very words of Scripture: "Behold, the Bridegroom cometh!" An application
was made of the parable of the bridegroom in Matthew 25:5-7: "While the
bridegroom tarried, they all slumbered and slept. And at midnight there
was a cry made, Behold the Bridegroom cometh; go ye out to meet him.
Then all those virgins arose, and trimmed their lamps." What led to this
movement was the discovery that the decree of Artaxerxes for the restoration
of Jerusalem which formed the starting point for the period of the 2300
days, went into effect in the autumn of the year 457 B.C., and not in the
beginning of the year, as had been formerly believed. Counting from autumn
of 457, the 2300 years terminate in the autumn of 1844 (there is no year
zero in the change from B.C. to A.D.). The movement spread throughout the
land, and thousands upon thousands sought the heart preparation that could
prepare them to meet their Lord. Study of the matter affirmed that October
22, 1844, was the date of termination of the 2300 years.
What Didn't Happen
The Lord did not come to an earthly tabernacle on October 22, 1844.
The Millerites waited seemingly in vain. The day came and passed, and Jesus
did not come to this earth. The sky was dark. The Millerites were stunned
and shocked. There was intense weeping through the night. The event expected
at the close of the 2300 year period, the cleansing of the heavenly sanctuary
had begun in heaven, and not upon earth.
Stories of Millerite believers donning "ascension robes" and waiting
upon high eminences and hills for the return of Christ have never been
confirmed. No evidence of such occurances has ever been uncovered. No 100
suicides in relation to any passing comet, or any other aspect of the movement
ever happened. As to such events, no historic sources provide any evidence
or even suggestion. No credible, or even incredible evidence exists to
support such assertions.
Were They Led By God?
As we consider this snapshot of their experience, we cannot help but
wonder if these persons were led by God or not. Can they have been so sincere,
and yet so wrong? Mustn't we consider them to be just another batch of
misguided nuts from a bygone era of confusion and ignorance? But I say,
as we answer this question, we must also come squarely to grips with our
own presuppositions. For example, would one be justified in believing that
because a date was actually set for the Lord's coming, the whole experience
must be written-off as misguided? What about it?
We must indeed affirm that the Bible teaches that "Of that day and hour
knoweth no man." Even our Lord said that He did not know, but only the
Father. Yet these statements only represent part of the Scriptural picture.
The same Bible also teaches that we may indeed know when it is near, even
at the doors (Matthew 24:32,33). Again, Paul tells us that the last day
will come upon the wicked as a great surprize. Yet of that final closing
time, he reminds them "But ye, brethren, are not in darkness, that that
day should overtake you as a thief. Ye are all the children of light, and
the children of the day" (1 Thessalonians 5:4,5). In our day things will
be as they were in the days of Noah. The Noachin world heard the preaching
of Noah - they saw the animals entering the ark in supernatural manifestation.
There were many signs of the nearness of that event. And did the Bible
say we would never know the day or the hour? Was even this portion
of the Millerite's belief so far fetched?
What of the disappointment they suffered? If they were truly led by
God, they would never have experienced the suffering of disappointment,
would they? But consider the disappointed expectations of God's people
throughout history - A foremost example being the apostles of Christ. They
expected Jesus to ride triumphally into Jerusalem and take the throne of
David, but He took the cross and death. True-hearted believers in God have
experienced disappointment, but still God has blessed their efforts for
Him and in spite of their sometimes misguided service, has used them to
proclaim timely truth that they otherwise might not have been able to proclaim.
The testimony of history indicates that we must be wary, and not close
our mind because of our underlying presuppositions. Sometimes they may
blind us to broader truths.
What of William Miller? What did he say after the disappointment?
He could say in earnest
Were I to live my life over again, with the same evidence that I then
had, to be honest with God and man I should have to do as I have done.[]
What We Can Learn From The Millerites?
What can we learn from the Millerites? I believe there are several
helpful things.
-
First of all, that we must orient ourselves firmly to the continual
seeking of light from the Bible. The Bible defines light as "that
which reveals." And the Bible itself is the great lamp, the great revealer
of objective truth. Unlike the tragic comet Hale-Bopp cult suicide participants,
the Millerites turned to the revelation of God as recorded in the Bible
for their light. They followed out the teachings of that Word, and
sought to live out the fullest implications of that Word. There was
a renouncing of subjective and whimsical human interpretations in favor
of the bedrock of the Bible.
-
Again, we must purpose to hold unshakably to a personal seeking of Jesus
Christ and the presence of His sustaining Holy Spirit. This was the
driving motivation ofthe Millerites. It must also be ours. If it is not,
we will easily drop into the abyss of the ridiculous or the whimsical and
empty.
-
Notwithstanding their fervent desire and their intensity of belief, even
they were disppointed in the end, because they failed to eradicate from
their belief system entrenched presuppositions not supported by the Scriptures
of inspiration. Encrusted theories not sustained by the Bible
led them to misunderstand the event expected at the close of the 2300 year
period in 1844. Today the Christian world in general seems to have
wandered even further from Bible solidity, and unsound interpretive methods
have led many to throw up their hands in confusion and resignation to give
up even trying to understand Bible prophecy. Every soul who falls into
this trap shall almost certainly be lost!
The Millerites were not comet kooks. They were Bible-believing Christians
whose fervor puts most contemporary Christians to shame.
Would that we might emulate them instead of make fun of them.
Sources
Damsteegt, P. Gerard Foundations
of the Seventh-day Adventist Message and Mission 1977
Froom, Leroy Edwin
Prophetic Faith of Our Fathers, Volume IV 1954
Knight, George R.
1844 and the Rise of Sabbatarian Adventism1994
Land, Gary
Adventism in America 1986
Loughborough, J. N.
Rise and Progress of Seventh-day Adventists 1892
Maxwell, C. Mervyn
God Cares, volume 2 1985
Nichol, Francis D.
The Midnight Cry
Shwarz, R. W.
Light Bearers to the Remnant 1979
White, Ellen G.
The Great Controversy 1911
|